fabian socialists misunderstand darwinism

subsidiary document to herds and the individual

beta release

site map

C O L O U R K E 'Y

"It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change

Charles Darwin

Darwin's rules are poorly understood by most people.

It is not the 'strongest' that survive as socialists have continually asserted. It is those best adapted to present conditions.

Socialist polices increasingly make it more likely that those on benefits who will survive.

Those who breed most 'survive' differentially.
Those on 'benefits' tend to live on the taxpayers.

Continually, socialists have advocated the 'successful' 'should' pay for the 'poor', right back from the early 20th century. Thus we have a growing class who do not work but are good at living off others.

In Darwinian terms, it is they that become the ones who best manage the changes in the environment.

leftist heaven on earth

Leftists tend to believe in heaven on earth, brought into existence by specialist technologists like bankers and 'sociologists'.

You can presently see this in the EUSSR with the technocrats parachuted in over the elected representatives of the countries going bankrupt under socialism

For atheistic, materialistic socialism, the end justifies the means, hence socialism inevitably moves towards mass murder, social deprivation and political correctness in the pursuit of their materialistic utopias. (See also Leaving Islam—‘apostasy’.)

Religious people are less inclined to hubris as they tend to believe they are subject to a higher ethics outside their own egos.

Alcoholic parent beating their children tends to be lower class abuse, a form of violence that anyone can recognise.

The middle classes tend to specialise in emotional abuse. this is far harder for a child to understand.

With a great deal of punishment of children, the children cannot understand what they are being punished for.

famous fabians

H.G. Wells wanted to poison the 'people of the abyss' . for wells these included the 'incompetent rich families

From Anticipations:

"The nation that most resolutely picks over, educates, sterilises, exports, or poisons its people of the Abyss.

"The nation that succeeds most subtly in checking gambling and the moral decay of women and the homes that gambling inevitably entails. The country that does this 'will certainly be the most powerful dominant nation before the year 2000'."

Wells recommended "painless voluntary euthanasia", "people for whom there is no hope of a happy fulfilled life".

He started the lot now known as 'Exit'!

'As for the rest, those swarms of black and brown, and dirty white and yellow people, who do not come into the new needs of efficiency? As I see it...they have to go.

Wells studied for a while under Thomas Huxley (Huxley also got at Orwell while Orwell was at Eton).

And then there was George Bernard (Shaw) -

"The notion that persons should be safe from extermination as long as they do not commit willful murder, or levy war against the Crown, or kidnap, or throw vitriol, is not only to limit social responsibility unnecessarily, and to privilege the large range of intolerable misconduct that lies outside them, but to divert attention from the essential justification for extermination, which is always incorrigible social incompatibility and nothing else."
[From George Bernard Shaw, "On the Rocks" (1933), Preface.]

*

"A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them."
[From George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express, March 4, 1910.]

*

"If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level."

Virtually all the leaders of the Fascist 'New' Labour Party are Fabians.

'secret' societies - fabianism and so on

It is a mistake to believe that 'secret' societies are in fact secret.

What is 'secret' about them is that the everyday members are not 'initiates'. In such societies or groups, at each level, the neophyte is told a little more of the real agenda. Thus, scientologists become 'clears'.

The group steadily tests the new member for loyalty and what would be well termed 'gullibility'.

There are alternative definitions of 'information'. Examples: when the sun is in the house of Mars, that society is a matter of two warring classes, and much other nonsense.

Only at the controlling levels will the full objectives become clear, usually one or another form of exploitation.

Some commonly known examples of 'secret' societies are the Fabians, the Free Masons or the Scientologists.

Most high panjandrums of the socialist/Labour party in Britain are Fabians. Much of the concern about Masons in southern Europe is that they also are seen as (an atheistic) front for socialism.

*

Machiavelli had it correct - trust a person's actions, not their words. Humans are widely addicted to words, the words addle their brains.

related material on group behaviour, ethics and social interactions

• Franchise by examination, education and intelligence
• Reality, laying the foundations for sound education
• The logic of ethics with commentary on the ethical teaching of Abelard le Pallet
• Feedback and crowding
• Categories, analogy and reification

advertising disclaimer

email email_abelard [at] abelard.org

© abelard, 2015, 30 january
all rights reserved

900 words
prints as 5 A4 pages (on my printer and set-up)

the address for this document is https://www.abelard.org/socialism/fabian-socialists-misunderstand-darwinism.php