transportable fuelsa briefing document |
||
|
on energy | on global warming | |||
sustainable futures briefing documents | Tectonics: tectonic plates - floating on the surface of a cauldron |
Index |
|
Introduction
I am no vehicle mechanic, car buff or physicist. My interest is confined to the fossil fuel problems. This briefing document is only intended to orient you, the reader, and give some idea where to look for further exploration of these topics if you so wish. |
|
|
For formation of methanol from electricity, air and water (pdf file). Howstuffworks.com is a useful site providing information and diagrams, such
as the next two links. Gasoline, or petrol, is an aliphatic hydrocarbon. That is, it is made up of molecules composed of only hydrogen and carbon, which are arranged in chains. Gasoline/petrol molecules have from seven to 11 carbons in each chain. Note that with less carbon (and hydrogen) in the chain, the molecule is lighter. With from one to four carbon atoms, the aliphatic hydrocarbon is a gas – methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10). With from five to 18 carbon atoms, the molecule is a liquid; while with 19 or over carbon atoms, the molecules are all solids at room temperature. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H H H H H H H | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Heptane [7] | | | | | | | H H H H H H H |
H H H H H H H H H | | | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Nonane [9] | | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H H |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H H H H H H H
H | | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Octane [8] | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
energy density (content) of common fuels
The energy content of carbon-based fuels per unit mass is fairly constant, but their density differs significantly. Thus, the energy content of a litre, or a gallon, varies between the various types of these fuels. abelard.org has standardised the table above using kWatt-hours, rather than MJ - megajoules, in order to enable easier understanding of other energy discussion at abelard.org, for instance at ‘a big power station’, or electricity usage and derivation. DiscussionHybrid-engined vehicles are starting to flow onto the market. These vehicles are up to a couple of thousand dollars more expensive than petrol-engined vehicles. Diesel vehicles are, similarly, more expensive than hybrids. Diesels are well established in Europe and, currently, give similar consumption performance, but they are rare in the USA. The situation becomes confused because there are all sorts of subsidies and goverment interference in the market of the vehicle, fuel and road-building sectors. For example, the USA is currently giving vast subsidies to heavy SUVs (sports utility vehicles). Smaller subsidies are available in California for hybrids. (This item on fuel consumptions includes links to tax breaks for SUVs and hybrids.) In the UK, approximately three-quarters of the fuel price is government tax, and diesel prices are maintained at the same level as petrol prices. On the European continent, diesel fuel prices are 20 + % lower than petrol ones, but any fuel saving is heavily offset by considerable tolls on motorways. It is probable that a diesel or hybrid vehicle will not do more than recover, in fuel savings, the excess expenditure over the vehicle's lifetime.[1] Government priorities tend to be to maximise tax revenue and appeasing their corporate clients, with no great concern for environment and efficiency. It is necessary to keep in mind that hybrid cars are more complicated and require heavy battery packs. Part of any assessment of a vehicle’s ecology credentials would have to include the energy and materials involved in its production. It is important to realise that lowering the weight of a vehicle also lowers the required size of the engine. This lowers the car’s weight still further—a virtuous feedback. Because hybrids can use their electric motors to assist immediate acceleration, the main drive unit may be smaller. Hybrids have the potential to generate less pollution; as also do diesels just by virtue of their lower fuel consumption. While there are particulate concerns with diesel, modern diesel engines and fuels are reducing these problems considerably. |
Comparison of miles per US gallon, miles per imp. gallon, litres per 100km | |||
mpg [UK] (km/g) | mpg [US] (km/g) | litres/100km | |
Dodge Ram SRT-10 > | 10 (16) | 8.3 (13.1) | 30.1 |
20 (32) | 16.7 (26.7) | 14.2 | |
30 (48) | 25.0 (40.0) | 9.5 |
|
40 (64) | 33.3 (53.3) | 7.1 | |
Toyota Echo (petrol) > | 50 (80) | 41.4 (66.7) | 5.7 |
Toyota P || Honda C || VW (diesel) > | 60 (96) | 50.0 (80.0) | 4.7 |
70 (112) | 58.3 ( 93.3) | 4.1 | |
Honda Insight (hybrid)> | 80 (128) | 66.7 (106.7) | 3.6 |
Comparison of miles per imp. gallon, miles per US gallon, litres per 100km | |||
mpg [US] (km/g) | mpg [UK] (km/g) | litres/100km | |
Dodge Ram SRT-10 > | 10 (16) | 12.0 (19.3) | 23.6 |
20 (32) | 24.1 (38.6) | 11.7 | |
30 (48) | 36.1 (57.8) | 7.9 | |
Toyota Echo (petrol) > | 40 (64) | 48.2 (77.1) | 5.9 |
Toyota P || Honda C || VW(diesel) > | 50 (80) | 60.2 (96.4) | 4.7 |
Honda Insight (hybrid) > | 60 (96) | 72.3 (115.7) | 3.9 |
70 (112) | 84.3 (134.9) | 3.4 |
Top-rated road vehicle fuel consumptions in the USA, 2003 | ||
Honda Insight | (hybrid - gasoline-electric engine) | 64 miles per US gallon |
Toyota Prius | (hybrid - gasoline-electric engine) | 48 mpg (US) |
Honda Civic Hybrid | (hybrid - gasoline-electric engine) | 48 mpg (US) |
Volkswagen TDI | (diesel engine) | 45 mpg (US) |
Toyota Echo | (petrol engine) | 38 mpg (US) |
US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rating, combined highway and city figures |
Conversion table | imperial [UK] gallon | US gallon | litre | |
imperial (UK) gallon |
1 | 1.2 | 4.546 | |
US gallon | 0.83 | 1 | 3.785 | |
litre | 0.22 | 0.26 | 1 | |
dodge city – is the USA quite mad?the public relations message from DaimlerChrysler
The letters SRT stand for Street and Racing Technology. |
This is how DiamlerChrysler introduces their new model:
Fuel consumption tests are performed
in the USA by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) [2]. Typically, such tests
are negociated between government and major interests like the oil and vehicle lobbies.You will notice
that these fuel consumption tests are deliberately designed to minimise
and underplay fuel consumption in normal driving. The official
line is that the tests are meant only to be used for comparing different
vehicle consumptions. There is no mention of 70 mph highway/motorway driving
or any other high fuel consumption activity, let alone going at 155
mph in a truck. For this last, the observer would wonder how many
gallons to the mile was being burnt up.
As you will see, here is an ordinary driver ending up with two-thirds, going on a half, the number of miles per gallon that the EPA figures would have led them to believe. Put this ludicrous Dodge truck into the hands of the sort of boy racer who would crave such a vehicle and you might wonder what chance of driving five miles to a US gallon. So much for DaimlerChrysler’s “conservational approach towards resources”. related material end notes
|
making gas guzzlers fuel-efficient, starting in the usa
|
latest | abstracts | briefings | information | headlines | resources | interesting | about abelard |
end notes
|
You are here: 7 transportable fuels < Briefings documents < Home |
email email_abelard [at] abelard.org © abelard, 2004, 04 march the address for this document is https://www.abelard.org/briefings/transportable-fuel.php 2760 words |