a common sense summary of what looks as if it may be a sane book
Some may find some the discussion at this site of interest.
Extraction:
“The flimsiness of the entire enterprise was brought home to
me in devastating fashion in a conversation with Elliot Valenstein,
a leading neuroscientist at the University of Michigan, and the author
of three highly regarded and influential books on psychopharmacology
and the history of psychiatry. I was talking to Valenstein about why
today’s psychiatric drugs address only a very small proportion
of the neurotransmitters that are thought to exist. Virtually all these
drugs deal with only four neurotransmitters: dopamine and serotonin,
most commonly, and also norepinephrine and GABA (technically known as
gamma-aminobutyric acid). While no one knows exactly how many neurotransmitters
there are in the humanbrain-indeed, even how a neurotransmitter
is defined exactly can be a matter of debate-there are at
least 100.
“So I asked Valenstein, "Why do all the drugs deal with
the same brain chemicals? Is it because those four neurotransmitters
are the ones understood to be most implicated with mood and thought
regulation—that is, the stuff of psychiatric disorders?"
“ "It’s entirely a historical accident," he said.
"The first psychiatric drugs were stumbled upon in the dark, completely
serendipitously. No one, least of all the people who discovered them,
had any idea how they worked. It was only later that the science caught
up and provided evidence that those drugs influence those particular
neurotransmitters. After that, all subsequent drugs were ‘copycats’
of the originals-and all of them regulated only those same
four neurotransmitters. There have not been any new radically different
paradigms of drug action that have been developed." Indeed, while
100 drugs have been designed to treat schizophrenia, all of them resemble
the original, Thorazine, in their mechanism of action. "So,"
I asked Valenstein, "if the first drugs that were discovered had
dealt with a different group of neurotransmitters, then all the drugs
in use today would involve an entirely different set of neurotransmitters?"
“ "Yes," he said.
“ "In other words, there are more than a hundred neurotransmitters,
some of which could have vital impact on psychiatric syndromes, yet
to be explored?" I asked.
“ "Absolutely," Valenstein said. "It’s all
completely arbitrary."
“The irony is that the shift to drug-oriented treatments has
occurred even as the techniques of psychotherapy have improved dramatically.
The old one-size-fits-all approach of long-term,
fairly unstructured, verbally oriented psychoanalysis or dynamic psychotherapy
has been replaced by a number of new approaches specifically geared
toward particular kinds of patients.
“Traditional therapies can work well for highly verbal "worried
well" patients with a fair degree of insight into their problems
and motivation to do something about them. But such therapies clearly
don’t work for many other people. Among the new, more tailored
approaches developed during the past 20 years is cognitivebehavioral
therapy (CBT), which gives patients the tools to examine the thoughts,
feelings, and beliefs that lie behind their behavior, and develops the
skills they need to enact change at a practical level. CBT has often
been shown to be as effective as drugs in treating mild to moderate
depression, with a significantly lower recurrence rate. It has also
been used effectively to treat a broad variety of conditions, including
bulimia, hypochondriasis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance
abuse, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and it has even
emerged as a means of reducing criminal behavior.
“Two other innovative treatment approaches-the Stages
of Change model and Motivational Interviewing-have helped
caregivers understand how to motivate (and help) people to change. These
methods’ tenets, in a nutshell, are that change should be viewed
as a cyclical rather than linear process; that the job of bringing about
change is the responsibility of the patient, not the caregiver (a reversal
of the centuries-old hierarchical construct of the doctor-patient
relationship); and that the caregiver’s approach must vary according
to the client’s "stage of change"-that is, the patient’s
level of insight and motivation to move forward. The positive outcomes
of these kinds of "psychosocial" approaches in addressing
some of the most difficult human problems-including addiction and
the resistance of people with mental and other illnesses to being drawn
into -treatment have been shown repeatedly.
“These and other verbally oriented treatments are increasingly
used by mental health professionals, but they have less appeal in the
citadels of modern psychiatric thought. There, the biological model
has triumphed, and not only because of the glittering promise it holds.
Biopsychiatry is driven by a complex network of forces, not the least
of which are the allure of treating patients expeditiously with drugs
rather than time-consuming and sometimes-messy therapies, and the huge
profits to be reaped from antidepressants, antipsychotics, and other
psychoactive drugs. For patients, however, the benefits of the new paradigm
are not nearly so unambiguous. By focusing so heavily on drugs,
though they can be highly effective, particularly for severe conditions-we
are neglecting to expose patients to the full array of treatments and
approaches that can help them get better.
“If there’s any lesson to be gleaned from the recent history
of psychiatry, it is, in the anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann’s words,
"how complex mental illness is, how difficult to treat, and how,
in the face of this complexity, people cling to coherent explanations
like poor swimmers to a raft."
“We don’t know much, but we should know just enough to
recognize how primitive and crude our understanding of psychiatric drugs
is, and how limited our understanding of the biology of mental disorder.
The unfortunate fact remains that the ills of this world have a tantalizing
way of eluding simple explanation. Our only hope is to be resolute and
careful, not faddish, in assessing new developments as they arise, and
to adopt them judiciously within a tradition of a gradually but steadily
growing arsenal in the fight against genuine human suffering.
“The part essay above is adapted from Charles Barber's new book,
Comfortably Numb: How Psychiatry Is Medicating a Nation,
which Pantheon will publish in February.”
|
Comfortably Numb: How Psychiatry
Is Medicating a Nation by Charles Barber
£15.32
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Pantheon Books, 2008, hbk
ISBN-10: 0375423990
ISBN-13: 978-0375423994
£9.50
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
$10.85
[amazon.com] {advert}
Vintage Books USA, pbk,
10 February, 2009
ISBN-10: 0307274950
ISBN-13: 978-0307274953
|
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#comfortably_numb_301208
|
advertising disclaimer
advertising disclaimer
advertising disclaimer
|
holiday reading as suggested by thomas sowell
“Also recommended are FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt's
New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression, by Jim Powell, a
book that documents the mistakes of Roosevelt's "New Deal"
which turned a recession in 1932 into the very long Depression of the
Dirty Thirties. Let us hope that Obama will avoid these mistakes, but
from his speeches on the economy it looks as if Obama is going the same
disastrous way as FDR. Mr. Sowell also recommends his own book "Economic
facts and fallacies" which we can only hope America's
Obama and Canada's P.M. will also find time to read this Christmas break.”
As usual, Thomas
Sowell is interesting. He is too modest in putting Goldberg's book
above his own...
“The most outstanding political book of 2008 has been Liberal
Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. It shoots to pieces the prevailing
ideas of who is on “the left” and who is on “the right.”
“It can become especially relevant in the coming year, if the
new administration goes further with the government interventions in
the economy begun by the outgoing administration — the kind of
economic policies that were at the heart of fascism.”
Thomas Sowell’s Economic facts and fallacies
(a summary in effect of several previous books) is on the edge of being ‘an
important book’. Goldberg’s is merely interesting background.
Goldberg’s book is, in
my view, very interesting, even fascinating, in terms of the emotional foolishness
and shallowness of the Left, but it under-estimates the deadly
foolishness of ‘collectivism’. Liberal Fascism is a strange, but limited,
discussion of the emotional world of the confused, but ‘well-meaning’, socialist.
Goldberg is particularly interesting on the history of twentieth-century socialist/fascist conceits
in the USA. He is often clumsy and inaccurate, both in detail and in
European factors.
He is also almost too polite.
This is a book for those trying to understand how anyone could ever take up what Keynes called “a doctrine so illogical and so dull”. It is a sort of source reader for any psychologist, sociologist or political analyst who just cannot quite believe it.
[See also leading
founders hated democracy??!]
I have not read the ‘Great Depression’ books
he cites, though I have recently read The
Forgotten Man on the same subject.
I do not think the handling of the Great Depression is as
simple as some of these recent revisionists claim. The Great Depression is now
a long way back in terms of economic understanding.
Keynes
is one of the very few great men/geniuses of the last century, but is
constantly used as a whipping boy by Rightist fundamentalists, who mostly
appear never to have read him. (He was not a dumb Lefty, as most who only
read socialist pamphlets have come to falsely believe.)
Keynes, in fact, despised socialism.
Further, the Great Depression was aggravated by continuing
belief in the
false god of gold. We know far more about fiat
currencies now. In considerable part because of Keynes, Greenspan
and others.
With the onrush of the factory system, the clinging
to the outdated dogmas of Puritanism are stopping modern
governments coming properly to terms with the continually shrinking of
necessary ‘work’.
This is part of what makes Gordon Brown, that dull son of the manse,
so unsuitable to cope with modern problems. Like the proverbial generals
of yore, so many are still trying to fight the last war.
related material
socialist
religions
Thanks to"Crap
Detector" for link.
|
FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt's New Deal Prolonged
the Great Depression by Jim Powell
£9.99
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Random House USA Inc, 2005 reprint, pbk
ISBN-10: 140005477X
ISBN-13: 978-1400054770
$10.17
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Three Rivers Press, 2004, pbk
ISBN-10: 140005477X
ISBN-13: 978-1400054770
|
|
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning
by Jonah Goldberg
Penguin, 2009, pbk
ISBN-10: 0141039507
ISBN-13: 978-0141039503
£6.59
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Doubleday, 2008, pbk
ISBN-10: 0385511841
ISBN-13: 978-0385511841
$18.45
[amazon.com] {advert}
|
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#holiday_reading_191208
|
useful
review of an upcoming book by malcolm gladwell
“Everyone, from all three groups, started playing at roughly
the same time - around the age of five. In those first few years, everyone
practised roughly the same amount - about two or three hours a week.
But around the age of eight real differences started to emerge. The
students who would end up as the best in their class began to practise
more than everyone else: six hours a week by age nine, eight by age
12, 16 a week by age 14, and up and up, until by the age of 20 they
were practising well over 30 hours a week. By the age of 20, the elite
performers had all totalled 10,000 hours of practice over the course
of their lives. The merely good students had totalled, by contrast,
8,000 hours, and the future music teachers just over 4,000 hours.
“The curious thing about Ericsson's study is that he and his
colleagues couldn't find any "naturals" - musicians who could
float effortlessly to the top while practising a fraction of the time
that their peers did. Nor could they find "grinds", people
who worked harder than everyone else and yet just didn't have what it
takes to break into the top ranks. Their research suggested that once
you have enough ability to get into a top music school, the thing that
distinguishes one performer from another is how hard he or she works.
That's it. What's more, the people at the very top don't just work much
harder than everyone else. They work much, much harder.
“This idea - that excellence at a complex task requires a critical,
minimum level of practice - surfaces again and again in studies of expertise.
In fact, researchers have settled on what they believe is a magic number
for true expertise: 10,000 hours.
“ "In study after study, of composers, basketball players,
fiction writers, ice-skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master
criminals," writes the neurologist Daniel Levitin, "this number
comes
up again and again. Ten thousand hours is equivalent to roughly three
hours a day, or 20 hours a week, of practice over 10 years... No one
has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished
in less time. It seems that it takes the brain this long to assimilate
all that it needs to know to achieve true mastery." ”
“This is an edited extract from Outliers: The Story Of Success,
by Malcolm Gladwell, to be published on November 27 by Allen Lane at
£16.99. Malcolm Gladwell: Live In London is on November 24 at
5.45pm and 8.30pm at the Lyceum Theatre, London. Tickets from £13.50
to £26.50. To book, call 0844 412 1742 or go to malcolmgladwell-live.com.
There will be an interview with Malcolm Gladwell in tomorrow's Observer.”
|
Outliers: The Story of Success
by Malcolm Gladwell
$16.79 [amazon.com] {advert}
Little, Brown and Company
hbk, 18 November, 2008
ISBN-10: 0316017922
ISBN-13: 978-0316017923
£8.49
[amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Allen Lane
hbk, 18 November, 2008
ISBN-10: 1846141214
ISBN-13: 978-1846141218 |
|
related
material
articles by Malcolm Gladwell
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#gladwell_151108
|
a bumper crop of business and management books, part three- the auroran sunset
A while ago, I asked abelard to recommend
to me some books from ab’s collection relating to business and management.
Here is the third (and last) batch of what I was given, with my comments:
Metal Men: Marc Rich and the 10-billion
dollar Scam
by A Craig Copetas
A recent history of the commodities markets
and the corruption that surrounds it. It is written as if for
a supermarket tabloid full of unnecessary sensationalisation and
adjectives, which gets annoying; but it is otherwise quite interesting.
Marc Rich was given a pardon by Bill Clinton, shortly before Clinton
left office. Marc Rich’s wife was a major donor to the Clinton
Library. |
|
Putnam,1985, hbk
ISBN-10: 0399130780
ISBN-13: 978-0399130786
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
|
What They Don't Teach You At Harvard Business
School
by Mark H. McCormack
Excellent book of business and management
advice. Very clearly written and organized. Mostly common sense,
with lucid examples. Like any "sales" book, there are
sections dedicated to the need to lie, which are fortunately kept
to a minimum, probably because the author doesn't seem very convinced.
This is a book I left almost till last
in a long list of recommended business books, because the title
did not sound interesting at all. Strange that this and the book
I left to last both have very bad titles and advertising, despite
constant advice on how to advertise!
|
|
Profile Business; New Ed edition , 1994,
pbk
ISBN-10: 1861975643
ISBN-13: 978-1861975645
£6.49 [amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Bantam, 1986, pbk
ISBN-10: 0553345834
ISBN-13: 978-0553345834
$12.24
[amazon.com] {advert} |
The Naked Market
by Robert Heller
Full of useful examples of good and
bad management with clear, if simplistic explanations. The title
is very misleading, as is the blurb, as are large parts of the
book. He really does seem to believe he is writing about marketing,
rather than management or business, but no matter how many times
he repeats his silly mantra, it's not convincing. Essentially
he tries to redefine "marketing" so broadly that it
loses all meaning. Apart from that annoyance, which is the reason
I left this recommendation till last, it is a very useful and
interesting book!
|
|
Sidgwick & Jackson Ltd, 1984, hbk
ISBN-10: 0283990120
ISBN-13: 978-0283990120 amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
|
People
Skills: How to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others, and Resolve
Conflicts
by R. Bolton
Having read just over half of this 300-page
book, I give up. Page after dull page of simplistic wishy-washy
platitudes. There is only so much I will suffer for my education!
|
|
ISBN-10: 067162248X
ISBN-13: 978-0671622480
Touchstone, 1986, pbk
$11.20
[amazon.com] {advert} /
Simon & Schuster, 1986, pbk
£5.84
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} |
Money Lenders: The Money Lenders: Bankers
and a World in Turmoil
by Anthony Sampson
Review here. |
|
amazon.co.uk
/ amazon.com
hbk
Coronet Books, from Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, 1982
ISBN-10: 0340287713
ISBN-13: 978-0340287712 |
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#business_management3_241008
|
a bumper crop of business and management books, part two
- the auroran sunset
A while ago, I asked abelard to recommend
to me some books from ab’s collection relating to business and management.
Here is the second batch of what I was given, with my comments:
Iacocca
by David Abodaher
Biography of a corporate highflier who turned
out to be a talented manager and marketeer. Interesting for how
he deals with various problems - the filler about his personal
life is not so interesting.
|
|
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
Star,1986, pbk
ISBN-10: 035231835X
ISBN-13: 978-0352318350 |
Today and Tomorrow (Corporate Leadership)
by Henry Ford [ghost written for Ford]
Henry Ford explaining how to run an industrial
giant with plenteous moralising asides. Fascinating and surprisingly
well written.
|
|
Productivity Press, reprint, 1988, hbk
ISBN-10: 0915299364
ISBN-13: 978-0915299362
£18.99
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} / $28.00
[amazon.com] {advert} |
Think: a Biography of the Watsons and IBM
by William Rogers
An unflattering biography of one of the world's
greatest salesmen. Apart from the salatious nonsense about his
personal life, very interesting business and history.
|
|
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
Stein & Day Pub, 1969, hbk
ISBN-10: 0812812263
ISBN-13: 978-0812812268 |
Boone
by T. Boone, Jr. Pickens
Very bright guy, very good businessman and
manager. Thoroughly recommended.
Also
see a review by abelard of this book. |
|
Houghton Mifflin, 1989
amazon.com
Hodder and Stoughton Ltd 1987
amazon.co.uk |
The Warren Buffett Way: Investment
Strategies of the World's Greatest Investor
by Robert G. Hagstrom
Very inconsistent and poorly written account of a
very interesting subject - clearly anyone would be better off just reading
Buffet’s words directly, for example from the Berkshire annual
reports available online. There is a constant logical error in his analyses - the
difference between knowledge we have now and knowledge Buffet could have
had at the purchase time is not made clear. That said, the
analyses of good and bad management is interesting, but you
’d still be better off just reading the great man directly.
|
|
Wiley, 2005, pbk
ISBN-10: 0471743674
ISBN-13: 978-0471743675
£6.99
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} / $10.17
[amazon.com] {advert} |
The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong
by Laurence Johnston Peter and Raymond Hull
"In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise
to his level of incompetence" - an amusing look at incompetence
and the bad management that cause it, with some pretty silly solutions.
Good for a giggle, even if occasionally the authors lose their rhythm.
- And a comment from abelard:
- A one-shot pony. Spinning it into a book was more
entrepreneurship than necessity.
- And a comment from the auroran sunset:
- abelard is correct that this book only has one idea.
However, they manage to keep finding new and amusing ways to illustrate,
such that it is entertaining almost all the way through. Unless you
are as single-minded a data seeker as abelard, you'll probably enjoy
it.☺
|
HarperBusiness, hbk, 2009
ISBN-10: 0061699063
ISBN-13: 978-0061699061
$16.04 [amazon.com] {advert}
amazon.co.uk |
HarperBusiness, pbk, 2011
ISBN-10: 0062092065
ISBN-13: 978-0062092069
$8.74 [amazon.com] {advert}
£9.99 [amazon.co.uk] {advert}
Kindle edition
706 KB
Print Length: 195 pages
HarperBusiness, 2014
Publication Date: April 1, 2014
ASIN: B00IRCZHXI
$6.96 [amazon.com] {advert}
£5.41 [amazon.co.uk] {advert} |
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#business_management2_141008
|
a bumper crop of business and management books, part one
- the auroran sunset
A while ago, I asked abelard to recommend
to me some books from ab’s collection relating to business and management.
Here is the first tranche of what I was given, and my comments:
Parkinson’s Law or the Pursuit
of Progress
by C. Northcote Parkinson
Parkinson’s first book of management
satire. Very silly, funny and true! Thoroughly recommended.
|
Library
of America, 1987, hbk
ISBN-10: 0940450291
ISBN-13: 978-0940450295 amazon.com
amazon.co.uk |
Law & the Profits Parkinsons Second Law
by C Northcote Parkinson
Taxes and waste - a sarcastic look at how bad management
leads to expenditure growing to meet income. Less laughs than the others,
but still fascinating.
|
John
Murray (1963)
ASIN: B0000CLQEI amazon.com
ASIN: B001G0S4UQ amazon.co.uk
|
In-Laws and Outlaws and Parkinson’s Third
Law
by Professor C. Northcote Parkinson
Satirical description of how many large companies
and government organizations are ‘managed’.
More serious than his first book - this one has useful tips for how
to manage better.
|
Houghton Mifflin, 1967, hbk
ASIN: B000J41NT4 amazon.com
|
The Law of Delay
by C. Northcote Parkinson
Like all of his books, it has many interesting,
amusing and informative caricatures of bad management and office politics.
This one focuses on ‘types’
of people. It’s one of his best,
if still not as out-and-out silly as his earlier work.
|
Ballantine
Books, 1972, pbk
ISBN-10: 0345225651
ISBN-13: 978-0345225658
amazon.com
amazon.co.uk
|
Stumbling on Happiness
by Daniel Gilbert
Interesting review of mental “optical illusions”
- ways in which the mind systematically fools itself. Worth a read.
Also
see a review by abelard of this book. |
|
Vintage, 2007, pbk
ISBN-10: 1400077427
ISBN-13: 978-1400077427
$10.17
[amazon.com] {advert} |
|
HarperPerennial, 2007, pbk
ISBN-10: 0007183135
ISBN-13: 978-0007183135 £5.49
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} |
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#business_management1_250908
|
house, medical series - a review
House [U.S. title: House M.D.] is a good illustration
of how any good (hospital) diagnosis is made, with well-structured and
multi-layered programmes. These include many ethics puzzles, yet can be
taken as entertainment complete with continuing, rather trite ‘love
interest’ stories and Addams Family-type interviews with blood spewing
from every conceivable human orifice. Viewers of another turn of mind
may enjoy the patterned structure of each episode, where the main medical
problem is echoed in the incidental problems of clinic patients, and often
in the particular aspects of House’s personal life being shown.
Thus the series appeals on several levels.
The House series is a very useful way of enthusing an understanding
and teaching of diagnosis, generalisable to any complex field. The programme
was created by, and has as its prime consultant, an ex-Harvard medic.
House is a model for a clear-thinking diagnostician, surrounded to a considerable
extent by colleagues, who come from an inadequate knowledge base to a belief
that they have solved problems when there is still much to do.
House is constantly driven to fully understand a situation, rather than
dismissing ‘loose ends’. As with any highly functioning person,
loose ends are a sign of danger and inadequate comprehension. Instead
of dismissing apparent loose ends, House actively seeks them, constantly on the search for
understanding to check and improve his own knowledge.
House is constantly driving home to his colleagues the correct message that
the first concern must be effectiveness, rather than emoting and ‘caring’.
Cuddy, his boss, hovers in the background as an ethical and legal backstop,
protecting House from idiots and from his own excesses.
The consultant on this series is continually emphasising that a person
of this calibre will be widely regarded as ‘odd’. And thus
House is cartoonised with heavily emphasised foibles, in order to ‘humanise’
him for a mass audience. “A spoon full of sugar makes the medicine go down”, wheras
in real life, many such people are far from odd amongst their peers, but they
may well emphasise eccentricities to ease their way through a mad culture.
The series could be usefully employed to educative processes, to enculcate
wisdom and mental fluency, or as a relaxant during courses and training.
The structure of the series is even mirrored in House’s determination not to miss
his favourite medical soap.
House M.D. is a demonstration of a clean mind in action.
related material
The psychology of Rex Stout, Nero
Wolfe and Archie Goodwin
Intuition, its
powers and perils - a review
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#house_160908
|
short book review - the money lenders : bankers in a dangerous world
by the auroran sunset
An interesting history of banking by an intelligent, and thus very confused,
socialist. As the author is infected with
socialist
nonsense, even if he tries very hard to be rational, the usual racism
and anti-money nonsense pervades the book.
Particularly amusing are the knots he ties himself in trying to reconcile “development
and money improves standards of living”, “those darkies are entitled
to their primitive ways”, “it’s bad for bankers to not try
to stop the darkies primitive ways when lending to them”, “it’s
bad for governments and other bankers to try to impose civilised standards on
those darkies who have a different ‘equally valid’ culture”,
“the socialist dictatorships are totally beyond the pale”, “socialism
is the way forward”, “the right-wing dictatorships that improve
standards of living, don’t kills so many people and usually prepare the
way for democracy are even worse”, “it’s all the bankers’
fault for lending money”, “the bankers must lend more money”,
“we mustn’t judge the primitive ‘culture’ of the barbaric
criminal ‘leaders’ ”, “lending to these barbarians encourages
them and so is bad”, “we must lend more anyway, because it is good
for the people”....
As I said, he is very confused - the usual lot of a socialist with any
brains: either they get very dishonest, very confused or they break free
of that poisonous religion.
Despite all that, he seems an honourable idealist (again like many in
similar predicaments) and tries to give the facts, although he does manage
to conveniently gloss over the atrocities of socialism and the reality
of advances in freedom and standards of living driven by the British Empire,
particularly as now run from the new capital of Washington. Interesting,
but requires a mark-9 crap-detector for sentient digestion.
The Money Lenders : Bankers in a Dangerous World
by Anthony Sampson
amazon.co.uk
/ amazon.com
hbk
Coronet Books, from Hodder & Stoughton Ltd? 1982
ISBN-10: 0340287713
ISBN-13: 978-0340287712
|
related material
the mechanics of inflation:the
great government swindle and how it works
the
sum of a geometric sequence: or the arithmetic of fractional banking
bank
systemic contagion
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#money_lenders_090908
|
the history of the ubiquitous, and not so humble, potato,
review by Xavier
When I started reading this book, Propitious Esculent [esculent:
suitable for eating; edible] I first thought I had made a mistake - it
was history, not how to grow potatoes. But I ploughed on and soon become
engrossed in this idiosyncratic history, a history of the world according
to the discovery, development and spread of potatoes as a major food crop.
Potatoes come originally from South America, from the high lands of the
Andes, and had then spread through the continent, enabling the growth
of the Mayan and Inca Empires. The arrival of Spanish explorers, who
became invaders, resulted in the destruction of the local empires and
their being supplanted by an European-controlled empire.
One of the aims of the Spanish Conquistadors was to find a more efficient
place to grow staple foods for the population in Spain, suffering from repeated
famines caused by a fickle climate and crop failures, as well as marauding
armies trashing the countryside. With the gold and silver, the Spanish also sent
barrels of potatoes back to their homeland, potatoes which had been found
often to grow better than wheat and beef animals on the poor Andean
soil.
In Europe, potatoes were first better known as a curiosity, and for their
flowers. Generally, the potato was regarded as poisonous, rather than
a source of food. But Spain was not the only European country with poor
harvests, or farming land ravaged by wars. Gradually, potatoes were grown
for food in more and more countries.
Antoin-Augustin Parmentier was a French prisoner of the Prussians during
the Seven Years War, being fed almost exclusively on potatoes for three
or so years. Parmentier was so impressed by his continued good health
on such a diet that, that when free again, he made a series of nutritional
studies on the potato. He won a prize for proposing the potato as a nourishing
substitute for other food during times of famine. Later, Parmentier persuaded
the French King, Louis XIV, and his wife Marie-Antoinette, that potatoes
were worth eating.
But the general population, however hungry they were in the years before
the Revolution, required more than charm to forget their suspicions, if
not fear, of potatoes. To win them over, at harvest-time, Parmentier set
guards around fields growing an experimental crop of potatoes, chasing
away the curious. The locals believed the crop must be valuable to be
thus guarded; so when the guards were withdrawn at night, the fields were
raided and potatoes became a favoured food. Parmentier received one of
the first Légion of Honneur medals for his work, and is
commemorated in the name of the French version of cottage pie - Hachis
Parmentier.
Potatoes were introduced to Ireland when a Spanish ship with a cargo
including potatoes was wrecked on the southern Irish coast. Some of the six hundred
captured Spaniards taught the Irish peasants who rescued them how to cook
and cultivate the vegetable, all were then massacred by the English authorities.
Potatoes grew well in the peaty humidity, and soon became the staple,
and almost only, diet of the Irish rural poor - allowed little land to
grow food, and earning a pittance working for English landlords. A hard-working
farmer would eat at least fourteen pounds of potatoes in a day, flavoured
with milk or whey. And this diet had helped Ireland’s population
to increase from 1.5 million people, in the early 1600s before the potato
was introduced, to 8.5 million in 1845, of whom more than ninety percent
were completely dependant on the potato.
Then, the Irish potato harvest failed abruptly in 1845, when the entire
harvest turned black and rotting from potato blight. The problem continued
because there were then no seed potatoes to plant - the famine deepened. Within
a few years, Ireland’s population had reduced by over 2 million -
at least one million dying of starvation and another million emigrating.
Because prohibitive tariffs were imposed in Britain on importing foreign
grain, in order to protect wealthy English landowners, imported grain
was always more expensive than home-grown wheat, barley or oats. These
tariffs were regulated by the Corn Laws [corn being a collective term
for food grains]. But local supplies were in no way sufficient to help
the millions starving in Ireland. It would be necessary to import large
amounts of Indian corn (maize) and wheat from the USA.
At this time, Parliament was heavily populated by landowners who benefited
greatly from the Corn Laws keeping prices artificially high. Eventually,
Robert Peel, the then Prime Minister, persuaded a reluctant House of Commons
that the Corn Laws be repealed, winning by a narrow majority.
“Are you to hesitate in averting famine which may come, because
it possibly may not come? Are you to look to and depend upon chance
in such an extremity? Or, good God! Are you to sit in cabinet, and consider
and calculate how much diarrhoea, and bloody flux, and dysentery, a
people can bear before it becomes necessary for you to provide them
with food? The precautions may be superfluous; but what is the danger
where precautions are required? Is it not better to err on the side
of precaution than to neglect it utterly?”
It is strange that, over a hundred and sixty years later, the United
Kingdom, and the world, is having similar cold feet about acting to prevent
another human disaster: the complete destruction of our civilisation, and even the world we
inhabit, because global warming might not be happening. As with alleviating
the Irish Famine, working to reduce global warming and the environment
is a win-win situation, except for a few greedy business magnates.
Although I have not yet finished Propitious Esculent, I
am happy to recommend this book as an interesting social history of many
parts of the world. I shall look elsewhere for information on the details
of growing potatoes.
|
Propitious Esculent, the potato
in world history by John Reader
Heinemann, 2008, hbk
ISBN-10: 0434013188
ISBN-13: 978-0434013180
£13.29
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} /
amazon.com
|
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#propitious_esculent_160708
|
stumbling towards better descriptions and refining measurements
A review of The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter
by Helen R. Quinn & Yossi Nir
I have read many popularisations of physics published
over the last century, from Bohr, Heisenberg and Planck to Einstein and beyond.
Every year, as the onrush of knowledge increases, so also
does the understanding, and thence the clarity of expression improves every
year . Almost every year now, another and better summary is published. And thus
it is with The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter.
This book is rather more advanced than most such popularisations,
but is written with an almost religious avoidance of mathematical models, illustrations
and definitions. While these details may be easily looked up in other sources,
I would have preferred, at the least, an appendix devoted to these matters;
especially since the writers understand their topic with much greater clarity
and depth than popularisations by talented reporters. Quinn and Nir would have
been very able to continue that clarity into such an appendix. (There is a very
useful appendix giving a short history of physics from 1800 to the present.)
This book is highly recommended to intelligent but busy people
trying to keep abreast of the modern world. It is much more clear than most
popularisations and, in particular, does not disappoint by retreating into waffle
and hand-waving when the authors are skating on the edge of their knowledge.
These authors are obviously working scientists on the very forefront of present
research. As with any serious scientists, they are quite prepared to say they
do not know, or where present knowledge is still hazy.
I would also consider this book as a useful present,
or necessary background reading for any promising 15 to 22 year old presently
in physics or mathematics education. In my view, the background clarifications
would help such young students to gain a more rounded understanding of these
sciences and of what lies ahead for them in these areas.
|
The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter
by Helen R. Quinn & Yossi Nir
Princeton University Press, 2008
ISBN-10: 0691133093
ISBN-13: 978-0691133096
£17.05
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} /
$19.77 [amazon.com] {advert}
|
This
linked item from sciencenews.org may give yet another warning of caution:
“But that scenario violates the Copernican principle, a notion
near and dear to the hearts of physicists and cosmologists, including
Caldwell and Stebbins. Named after the 16th century astronomer Nicolaus
Copernicus, who made the then heretical proposal that Earth does not
have a favored, central position in the solar system, the principle
states that humans are not privileged observers in the universe, but
have just as good — or bad — a vantage point as any other
observer in the cosmos.
“ “Although the Copernican principle may be widely accepted
by fiat, it is imperative that such a foundational principle be proven,”
Caldwell and Stebbins assert in the May 16 Physical Review Letters.
The researchers suggest a concrete way to check once and for all whether
our neck of the cosmic woods is different from other parts of the universe.
Their test relies on observations of the cosmic microwave background,
the leftover radiation from the Big Bang that bathes all parts of the
universe.”
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#antimatter_review_170508
|
understanding statistics
Economic facts and fallacies uses a variety
of examples in social science to teach greater caution and perception of errors
in statistical reasoning. Statistical reasoning is, generally, very poor in
the population at large, even among those who may be considered ‘well-educated’.
The book is, therefore, highly recommended and would
serve as useful background reading and support for any useful course in
reasoning ability and scientific understanding. I have even purchased
a few copies and sent them to people I think can profit from the book.
“Throughout history, the world has abounded with differences that are
today called "disparities" or "inequities," even in situations
where they cannot be explained by discrimination. At one time, in czarist
Russia, nearly all of the members of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences
were of German ancestry, even though people of German ancestry were only about
one percent of the population of Russia. Today, more than 40 percent of all
the billionaires in the world are in one country--the United States. The list
could go on and on, until it filled a book. But, however common such statistical
disparities have been around the world and throughout history, many continue
to reason as if any statistical differences between any groups and suspicious,
if not sinister.
“Another fallacy, already noted in Chapters 5 and 7, is what might
be called the fallacy of changing composition. When statistical categories
are, compared over time, the changing relationships among these categories
can be completely misleading as to what is happening to the people or the
nations in those categories, when the composition of these categories is changing
over time. There may be growing inequalities between those categories during
the very same span of years when there is a lessening of inequality
between the people or nations who constitute those categories. Moreover, important
conclusions and decisions can be based on this fallacy.
“For example, the growth of international free trade has been said
to increase inequality among nations because the 23-to-one ratio between the
twenty richest and twenty poorest nations in 1960 rose to a 36-to-one ratio
in 2000. But the nations constituting the 20 richest and 20 poorest were different
in 1960 and 2000. Comparing the same twenty richest and twenty poorest
nations of 1960 over those decades shows that the ratio between the richest
and poorest declined to less than ten-to-one. This leads to the directly
opposite conclusion, suggesting that freer international trade may have helped
reduce inequalities among nations, allowing some of the initially poorest
to rise out of the category of the bottom twenty.
“Whatever the reason for the declining inequality, the fallacy of believing
that international inequality had increased, when in fact it had decreased,
is similar to that in an old joke about automobile accidents in Manhattan.
In this joke, one friend says to another that statistics show that a man is
hit by .a car in Manhattan once every 20 minutes. To which the other replies,
"He must get awfully tired of that." The fallacy here is that it
is obviously not the same man each time. The very same fallacy underlies much
more serious conclusions about both personal and international inequalities
over time, when it is not the same individuals or the same nations that are
being compared, since each moves from one category to another over time. The
changing composition of the categories makes conclusions based on comparisons
between the categories fallacious.
“Statistics are no better than the methods and definitions used in
collecting them. Without scrutinizing those methods and definitions, we cannot
assume that comparable people are being compared, whether comparing the incomes
of high school dropouts with college graduates, the incomes of members of
different ethnic groups who have the "same" education, or the incomes
of single women with married women, when "single" women includes
women who were married for years before getting divorced. Nor can statistics
about the amount of air pollution in populated areas versus open space tell
us anything about whether letting people move into unpopulated areas will
increase the total pollution over all, since it is people--not their locations--that
generate pollution.
“Perhaps most dangerous of all is the practice of not subjecting fashionable
beliefs to the test of facts, but instead accepting or rejecting beliefs according
to how well they fit some pre-existing vision of the world. The idea that
government intervention is needed to create "affordable housing"
is an idea that makes sense only in the context of a preconceived notion,
while mountains of hard evidence point in the exact opposite direction. The
belief that ghetto riots such as those of the 1960s are a reaction against
poverty, discrimination, unemployment, and blighted communities simply will
not stand up in the face of hard evidence of when and where those riots took
place, which were not in the places or times where these factors were worse.
“The entire educational and employment history
of women in the first half of the twentieth century is almost invariably ignored,
even in scholarly studies, to concentrate attention on what has happened since
1960, which can be made to fit a preconceived vision of the reasons for women's
rise. Similarly with blacks, whose rises out of poverty and into middle class
occupations are likewise traced almost invariably from some point after 1960,
and attributed to the civil rights movement and government actions of that
decade, even though the most dramatic rises of blacks out of poverty occurred
in the two decades before 1960. Nothing is more fallacious than to
ignore a trend that began years before some policy or action that is credited
with whatever happened as a continuation of a pre-existing trend. Similar
fallacies have appeared in discussions of things ranging from automobile fatality
rates to market shares of companies after an antitrust lawsuit.” [Pages
217-219]
|
Economic facts and fallacies
by Thomas Sowell
Basic Books, 2008, hbk
ISBN-10: 04650003494/
ISBN-13: 978-04650003494
£14.24
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} /
$17.16 [amazon.com] {advert}
|
related material
Why Aristotelian logic
does not work
Intelligence: misuse and abuse
of statistics
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#sowell_economics_190408
|
on psychobabble
“On such a flimsy underpinning was the new disorder launched
- one of seven new anxiety disorders that were often hard to distinguish,
including Schizoid Personality Disorder and Avoidant Personality Disorder.
But as soon as they appeared in DSM III, such shortcomings were all
forgotten, and the new disorders rapidly became targets for aggressively
promoted drug treatments.”
related material
psychobabble
pharmaceutical corporate corruption
|
Shyness
by Christopher Lane
Guilford Press, 2006
£18.04
[amazon.co.uk] {advert} / $18.15
[amazon.com] {advert} hbk
Yale University Press.
ISBN-10: 0300124465
ISBN-13: 978-0300124460
|
the web address for the article above is https://www.abelard.org/news/review2008.php#psychobabble_020308
|
|