print interview with bernanke since appointment to head fed | economics news at abelard.org
latest changes & additions at abelard.org link to short briefings documents link to document abstracts link to list of useful data tables quotations at abelard.org, with source document where relevant economics and money zone at abelard.org - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net latest news headlines at abelard's news and comment zone socialism, sociology, supporting documents described France zone at abelard.org - another France Energy - beyond fossil fuels visit abelard's gallery about abelard and abelard.org

back to abelard's front page

site map
'Y

news and comment
economics

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone topic archives: economics

for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)

New translation, the Magna Carta

  first print interview with bernanke since appointment to head fed
[12 pages]

“So, what this means is that economic policy, and financial oversight have to take into account all the international dimensions of that. So, for example, on the monetary policy side, we have worked carefully and closely with other central banks to talk about monetary policy in different parts of the world. In fact, during the heat of the crisis in October 2008, the Federal Reserve and five other major central banks cut interest rates together on the same day, as a sign of how committed we were to cooperating on monetary policy." [From sheet 4]

Marker at abelard.org

“ We think the only expansion of authority which we think is appropriate would be to not only banks, but other large financial companies whose failure might pose significant risk to the financial system. That's the extension of responsibility that we think is appropriate” [from page 9]

There are a couple of references to the “too big to fail” problem and “how we must do something”, but not clear solutions.

To quote Bernanke:

“...I want to be very, very clear, too-big-to-fail is one of the biggest problems we face in this country...” [p.10 )

I am of the view that it is a problem without a solution under a government fiat banking cartel and international banking competition.

So I believe this talk to be empty posturing.

related material
fanny mae and freddie mac - a history
fanny mae and freddie mac - the best politicians money can buy?
fanny mae and freddie mac - clearing up the mess
fannie mae / freddie mac - a summary

the web address for this article is
https://www.abelard.org/news/economics102009.php#bernanke_161209

controlling spending and government deficits - historic analysis

This is around 60-70 pages of medium print. Here is its contents page:

  1. Introduction 21
    Background: Spending, consolidation and growth 23
    Theory of the impact of fiscal consolidation on growth 25
  2. Six Historical Episodes 27
    1922-29 —The Geddes Axe 27
    1931 — Balancing the Budget in the face of Depression 32
    1968/9 — IMF Bailout 37
    1976 — Second IMF Bailout in short succession 43
    1980s —Thatcher Medicine and Thatcher Miracle 49
    1990s — Deficit correction, Clarke’s ‘cheerful tightfistedness’, 59
    and the ‘Iron Chancellor’
  3. Six International Episodes 67
    Sweden: 1994-1998 67
    Finland: 1994-2000 72
    Canada: 1994-2000 78
    Ireland: 1987-2000 84
    Germany in the 1990’s 90
    Netherlands: 1983-2000 95

“Fiscal correction should be biased towards spending cuts. Successful consolidations have typically placed around 80% of the burden on spending cuts; 20% tax rises. Britain’s first postwar attempt to control spending, after the first IMF bailout of 1968, was heavily biased towards tax rises and proved unsustainable. In the early 1980s Ireland initially tried to close its deficit with a programme heavily biased towards tax rises – but this strategy had to be abandoned in favour of a “Programme for National Recovery” almost entirely based on spending cuts. Our sample of case studies reinforces the conclusion of previous work by the IMF that, “fiscal adjustments which rely primarily on spending cuts on transfers and the government wage bill have a better chance of being successful and are expansionary.On the contrary fiscal adjustments which rely primarily on tax increases and cuts in public investment tend not to last and are contractionary.” ”