news and comment
|
topic archives: behaviour and intelligence for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)
|
I have been reading deeply on the problems for Rome with anti-Semitism in the 1930s, mainly concerning Pius XI (11th). A gross confusion comes out of the 19th century, where commonly 'blacks' and 'asiatics' tended to be thought of as 'races'. This is a confusion only made by the most ignorant in the modern era, and then extended, by the seriously ignorant, to 'Jews'. In the 1930s, the Church had a very long history of being down on Jews because they supposedly killed god, 'deicide' being the term of usage. Meanwhile, the then pope was much concerned with the racism of Hitler (a Catholic apostate) and others. Racism is deemed a heresy as it denies that all people are children of god. Then there is an ignoramus like Ed Miliband who claimed to be both a Jew and an atheist, an obvious contradiction in terms. Perhaps they are 'racists'? Now the idiocracy want yet another box (category) labelled 'ethnicity' [whatever that means] to justify their hatreds and various irrationalisms. These Haters should work on sorting their bigotry into more functional, or even more modern, boxes. related material
|
||||||||||||||
governments controlling behaviours - a hierarchy of legitimacy
It isn't just the force that makes for illegitimacy. The socialist government of Syria clearly is illegitimate.
It is shelling and bombing its 'own' population, Forcing parents to have a child inoculated against deadly contagious diseases is more complex. And from abelard's document from 2000, the logic of ethics :
| ||||||||||||||
|
the web address for the article above is |
Old-style schools, where maybe 20% went to a selective school, causes as many problems as it solves. In fact, even during the 1960s and later, less than 10% went onto higher education, including polytechnics. In 1945, it would have been less then 5%. Selective schools may once have been a pragmatic answer to a devastated country after a great war, but that will not meet much changed modern conditions.
You see two graphs below. Take as an example 1960 where it is estimated that maybe 25% went to a grammar school. Yet of these, only about 5% ended up in higher education. It was not just the three quarters who were headed for dead-end jobs, but also four-fifths of those who went into grammar schools.
While I cannot rely on these numbers with much confidence, the modern propaganda that is coming from the few who did do well in grammar schools, is that these schools helped the poor escape their background.
Most of those that did do well were, in fact, those that came from better educated and upper middle-class backgrounds. Their parents could afford to help support their children through extended education, instead of them being forced to leave school to help support their families. As you can see on closer examination, the idea of the grammar school as an escape route form poverty becomes very thin.
Interestingly, if you examine the graphs you can see that, in general, as grammar school attendance fell, in fact, higher education participation rose!
The school leaving age in the UK was raised from 15 to 16 in 1972.
related material
intelligence and madness
citizenship curriculum
reality, laying the foundations for sound education
1880 | from 5 years to 10 years old |
1893 | to 11 years |
1899 | to 12 years |
1921 | to 14 years |
1944 | to 15 years |
1972 | to 16 years |
Alongside this tendency, increasing provision and pressure was developing for part-time schooling, for instance evening school, day release, apprenticeships. Considerable efficient training also occurred in the armed forces.
the web address for the article above is |
"We'll do your dirty work if you'll shut up about our dictatorship."
Linked artice is headed "Syrian conflict: US and Russia agree peace moves"
"Russia and the US have agreed to co-ordinate air strikes against Islamist militants in Syria, part of a detailed agreement to reduce the violence there. The plan will begin with a "cessation of hostilities" from sunset on Monday. Syrian forces will end combat missions in specified opposition-held areas. Russia and the US will then establish a joint centre to combat jihadist groups, including so-called Islamic State (IS). A Syrian opposition coalition has cautiously welcomed the agreement."
the web address for the article above is |
You are here: behaviour and intelligence news from September 2016 < News < Home |
latest | abstracts | briefings | information | hearing damage | memory | France zone |
email email_abelard [at] abelard.org © abelard, 2016, 10 september variable words |