site map
C O L O U R K E 'Y

news and comment
behaviour and intelligence

another sociology text on parenting reviewed

This book, Love, money, and parenting, is, as is common, riddled with logical errors, but is useful for all that in keeping up with the ed. biz and what is being pushed at unis.

It is written by Europeans 'working' in the USA, where the money is better!

The authors start be dividing parenting into four (crude) categories - authoritarian, permissive, authoritative and uninvolved, the last one being slobsville!

One of the most egregious errors is to equate 'permissiveness' with liberal mindedness, and authoritative approaches with 'right wing'. This quite misses the overwhelming authoritarian approach of much of the current 'education' estalishment which hard sells permissiveness, a form of authoritarianism.

Despite their clear wish to push the party line, their results do show the most 'successful' outcomes are from the authoratative parenting groups. Permissiveness is a bit behind and, of course, 'unnvolved' trails way behind.

Another logical error is not comprehending that in a permissive society like Sweden, those expressing fashionable notions are liable to do better than those who are more 'realistic'.

There are many other lesser errors of logic, or what passes for logic in university sociology departments.

related reading

reality, laying the foundations for sound education
citizenship curriculum
social skills/relationship training

Love, money, and parenting: how economics explains the way we raise our kids by Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti
	Princeton University Press, Dec. 2018, hbk ISBN-10: 0691171513 ISBN-13: 978-0691171517 £18.79[amazon.co.uk] {advert} $7.49 [amazon.com] {advert}	Kindle edition File Size: 4318 KB Print Length: 372 pages Princeton University Press, Feb. 2019 ISBN: 0691171513 ASIN: B07GBHJXQX £20.04 [amazon.co.uk] {advert} $23.23 [amazon.com] {advert}

advertising
disclaimer

mollycoddle children, fuel mental illness in teenagers?

From a correspondent: "Of course we want to keep children safe. But exposure to normal stresses and strains is vital for their future wellbeing"

abelard's response is a commentary on the linked news item:

This is certainly an improvement on most of the rubbish posted by the Groaniad.

Nassim Taleb is among a few commentators who have a firm logic foundation.

'Balance' should be more emphasised.

Figures are often unreliable because of reporting shifts.

In a world where people are breeding at less than replacement rates,the individual child becomes far more 'precious'.
This makes parents more anxious than in times when a wastage rate was the general expectation.
Not only are there less children in a family on average, there is far more investment in each child. The Chinese refer to them as young princes.

In a family of three children, one death is 30%. In a family with 10 children, one death is 10%.
Percentages are abused in the article as is habitual with the Groaniad and most politicians.
The 'article' focuses on the 'children', but much of the problems are related to 'adult' foolishness which often leads to spoilt children and adults.

related material

reality, laying the foundations for sound education
franchise by examination, education and intelligence

small lesson on stats for innumeracists - stop worshipping sums

The worship of numbers is a form of idolatry (believing that the are proof, for example).
The absence of numbers indicates sloppy thinking.

What is the average of 49 and 51?
What is the average of 1 and 99?

With Gini numbers,
are you comparing the top 20% with the bottom 20%, or
are you comparing the top 5% with the bottom 5%?

Always ask whether Gini numbers apply to capital (wealth) or income, and
whether government transfers such as pensions, 'free' schools, hospitals, roads, defence etc. are included in income figures.

If there is a greater proportion of billionaires in a country and you use 5%, you are likely to have very different results than if you compare 20%;

and

all governments lie with stats.

Some even stuff ballot boxes, while others control all the media.

Do you really believe a statistic coming out of China is of the same quality of one coming out of Britain, the USA, or even the EUSSR and, thereby, safely comparable?

related material

sums, fractions, decimals, percentages and ratios 1
understanding graphs and charts
orders of magnitude, indices and logarithms

advertising
disclaimer

advertising
disclaimer

email email_abelard [at] abelard.org

© abelard, 2018, 14 april
all rights reserved

variable words
prints as increasing A4 pages (on my printer and set-up)