the geneva convention and donald trump | politics - world news at
latest changes & additions at link to short briefings documents link to document abstracts link to list of useful data tables quotations at, with source document where relevant economics and money zone at - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net latest news headlines at abelard's news and comment zone socialism, sociology, supporting documents described France zone at - another France Energy - beyond fossil fuels visit abelard's gallery about abelard and

back to abelard's front page

site map

news and comment
politics - world

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone topic archives: politics - world

for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)

New translation, the Magna Carta

This page helpful? Share it!

the geneva convention and donald trump

It is a mistake to believe that the Geneva Convention is about how civilised we are and how uncivilised they are.

War is a very nasty part of human nature and experience.

But the Geneva Vonvention is not there because we love the enemy... it's there simply because they are scared we'll do to them what they do to us...

and us are scared that they'll do to us what we do to them...

to play by our rules while daeish behaves with complete barbarism is simply extreme foolishness...

trump may be a bit clumsy in his articulation...but he is correct to advocate being just as ruthless to daeish and they are.. it is only that which will curb the worst of their bestiality...

related material
citizenship curriculum
franchise by examination, education and intelligence
reality, laying the foundations for sound education
ends and means and the individual
‘just war’

the web address for the article above is




the big oil lie
[link to useful article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard]

Context: Crude oil prices are dropping despite the warring in various countries in the Middle East.

The Saudis don't just reduce the crude oil supply to increase prices, they also drop prices to drive out competition.

Shale oil is much more expensive to extract, than the common 'put down a pipe and suck it out of the sands'.

If OPEC drives down the price of oil, shale oil becomes too expensive to extract, and companies and countries will lose trillions.
Then OPEC will hope to put up the prices back again.

related material
tar sands and shale oil

the web address for the article above is

'corporatism', salazar style (on constitutions)

António de Oliveira Salazar (1889-1970) was an intellectual who built the Portuguese constitution on Rerum Novarum, Quadragesimo and Divini Redemptoris, three papal encyclicals written by Pius XI.

It is vital to understand the differences between the 'corporate state' and the 'corporative state', these are often confused! Here (mostly) Salazar is describing his (Portugal's) corporative state in contrast to the corporate state of Fascism. The corporate state is elsewhere described by the papacy as 'statolatry', that is, the worship of the state

Keep in mind that Catholic theology has nothing to say on the form in which states are ruled, only on whether respect for the individual and their conscience is honoured. Thus, Catholic theology does not insist on 'democracy'.

"He proceeds to emphasise that no Government can govern truly in the national interest unless It completely transcends the party spirit, and actively opposes any tendency of the party spirit to return.

"It must always be remembered that he is talking about Portugal, and that the Estado Nova is Portuguese.

"I have not a horror of parties in a general way: I have a horror of the party spirit in Portugal. England has lived for centuries under a party system, and has managed quite well so far . . . . But in Portugal these groups have formed themselves round individuals or vested interests or seekers after power, simply in their own interests. That is the sort of party spirit that must be ended if we are to achieve any real work of reconstruction"

"The more profound is our feeling of the organic reality of the Nation, the more necessary it becomes to thrust aside all factions, parties, and groups to which individuals adhere according to hance circumstances. There will be no more such politics, and two benefits will result: for the Nation, the fact that the Government will work solely for it, and for the Government, the splendid liberty of being able to serve only the nation."

"Contrasting the Portuguese with the Italian and other revolts against the party system, he writes:

"The military origin of the Portuguese dictatorship will always give a special characteristic to our revolution. With us, it was not a party, a revolutionary force, which seized power; it was the army, the voice of the nation, which intervened to create the conditions necessary to the existence of a Government that should be both national and opposed to the parties. The armed forces do not constitute a party, do not represent a party, cannot depend on any party."

"The Portuguese experience has not consisted in the application by some triumphant faction of a programme previously prepared. What has happened has been that a completely disinterested Government has been placed in power by the army, and preserved in power by the gratitude of the people. The break with nineteenth century liberalism has been complete: that which has arisen is called the Estado Novo, the New State; but it is really very old, as old as Christendom and Kings. Portugal, then, is not Fascist, for this reason: that in Italy, which is Fascist, a party with a programme gained power and applied it. In Portugal, a man with a number of fundamental principles, and those principles little more than the bases of Christian morals, was placed in control and fostered and developed a truly Portuguese Portugal.

"There Is no etatisme In Portugal: that Is why Portugal is not Fascist. In rejecting Liberalism, Salazar has preserved liberty. He has preserved Portugal from any form of totalitarianism. To quote him again: "The State which would subordinate all without exception its morality, Its law, its politics, its economy to the idea of nation or of race as represented by itself would come forward as an omnipotent being, a beginning and end In itself, to which all existences, both individual and collective, must be subjected, and would give rise to a worse form of absolutism than that to which the Liberal regimes succeeded. Such a State would be essentially pagan, of its nature incompatible with the spirit of our Christian civilisation. . . .

"The (Portuguese) Constitution, approved by popular plebiscite, rejects as Irreconcilable with Its ends all that proceeds, directly or Indirectly, from this totalitarian conception. It begins by establishing the moral law and justice as limits to Its own sovereignty; it obliges the State to respect its natural obligations towards the individual, the family, the corporation, and local government; it assures liberty and inviolability of religious beliefs and practices; It acknowledges the right of parents to educate their own children; it guarantees the rights of property, capital, and labour, within the social harmony, it recognises the Church, with the organisations which are proper to her, and leaves her free to carry on her spiritual work."

From Chapter 5, entitled Portugal is not fascist.
The Portugal of Salazar, Derrick, 1938, pp.157-160.

the web address for the article above is

energy dependence - russia, ukraine

"November 5, 2013 Ukraine signed a $10 billion shale gas production-sharing agreement with U.S. oil giant Chevron on Tuesday, another step in a drive for energy independence from Russia."
[Quoted from]

Marker at

"MOSCOW — Even as American and Russian diplomats groped toward a settlement that would halt further Russian military intervention in Ukraine, Gazprom, the Russian energy company, stepped up the economic pressure on Tuesday by sharply raising the price it charges for natural gas."
[Quoted from]

While Putin is clearly revealing himself as a bad neighbour, it is the right of Russia to sell energy for whatever it can get. After all, like any backward country, they have little else to offer beyond the exploitation of natural resources.

But it is also the right of anyone else to attempt to get free of the Russian blackmail. Further, it is unlikely the blackmail will last long in a world of the mass oil exchange market.

Putin is shooting Russia in the foot. He is not some great leader to be admired, he is simply a fool with mad dreams of yesterday. But primarily, he was the problem of the Russian people until he started invading other democratic areas/countries. One can but hope the pressures on him will grow until his irresponsibility is curbed/mitigated.

The governments of the West are like the unwise virgins, they should never have allowed this dependency mess to develop. Clean, safe nuclear power would solve the energy problems, if only Western politicians would show some sense and guts. This energy upgrade should have been put in places decades ago.

I might remind the reader that oil has been a major factor in wars for over one century. This dereliction of sense and duty is no small potatoes.

related material
nuclear power - is nuclear power really really dangerous?
the nuclear energy option
russia is a weak and dying giant

the web address for the article above is

You are here: politics - world news from April 2014 < News < Home

latest abstracts briefings information   hearing damage memory France zone

email abelard email email_abelard [at]

© abelard, 2014, 03 april
all rights reserved

variable words
prints as increasing A4 pages (on my printer and set-up)