interesting that redwood doesn't get to the heart of the problems with central banking | economics news at abelard.org
latest changes & additions at abelard.org link to short briefings documents link to document abstracts link to list of useful data tables quotations at abelard.org, with source document where relevant economics and money zone at abelard.org - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net latest news headlines at abelard's news and comment zone socialism, sociology, supporting documents described France zone at abelard.org - another France Energy - beyond fossil fuels visit abelard's gallery about abelard and abelard.org

back to abelard's front page

site map
'Y

news and comment
economics

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone topic archives: economics

for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)

New translation, the Magna Carta

  interesting that redwood doesn’t get to the heart of the problems with central banking

The real reason the recent problems cannot be solved, despite the varying factions John Redwood does mention, is that banking is a government cartel, a monopoly.

Ron Paul is another gold bug who also misses this central factor.

Within the straight-jacket of accepted unquestioned dogma, John Redwood has some grasp of the real problems the gold bugs and others would generate.

But the only way to break the problem, should you be prepared to carry the costs, is to allow banks to issue their own money and to allow people to choose banks with the policy stance/s customers favour (regulation then becomes a matter of monitoring fraud).

The only way to hope for monetary probity is competition.

This is, of course, why governments do everything possible to remove such competition, as demonstrated by the European monetary union.

In free banking, one bank may offer you gold-based banking.This would mean lower risk and would end in you paying higher banking charges. Another bank could offer you money linked to a basket of goods, or to wage levels, or housing.

Another bank could offer you a high reserve ratio, and thus lower risks and lower profits. Another could offer you a low reserve ratio, and attendant high profits with high risk.

This process would give you much greater choice, and get interfering governments out of another part of public life where they operate to your grave disadvantage.

No wonder no government is proposing such freedoms. They are making far too much money out of inflation taxes and exerting far too much power through their control of the presses.

related material
the mechanics of inflation: The great government swindle and how it works

the web address for this article is
https://www.abelard.org/news/economics102010.php#redwood_central_banking_021110

the deliberate intentions of sub-prime, the history of the current usa ‘depression’

This history includes:

  • 1930s: Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal
    Fannie Mae started as the Federal National Mortgage Association.
    Fannie Mae provided local banks and thrifts with money needed to
    finance home mortgages.
  • 1968: Lyndon Johnson converted Fannie Mae into a public-private hybrid called a “government-sponsored enterprise” [GSE].
  • 1970: Freddie Mac, was created so Fannie Mae would not monopolise mortgage buying (but they have, in fact, marched in concert).
  • 1977: Under Jimmy Carter, the Community Reinvestment Act [CRA] compelled banks to make loans to poor borrowers.
  • 1999: Under Bill Clinton, banks were given strict numerical quotas for forcing sub-prime loans.

There is another way you can see this, as no accidental breakdown but a deliberate attempt to “spread the wealth around”. Many of the people who could not afford the properties are now steadily being bailed out. There are pseudo-legal attempts to stop repossession etc.

Bush, McCain and Greenspan all warned this was a disaster waiting to happen, and tried to stop it. The Democrats blocked changes.

Obama is heavily enmeshed in Wall Street, with several of Wall Streeters in his administration.

I am increasingly convinced that much of this mess has been at least semi-deliberately engineered.

related material
fanny mae and freddie mac - a history
fanny mae and freddie mac - the best politicians money can buy?
fanny mae and freddie mac - clearing up the mess
fannie mae / freddie mac - a summary