claim: iran wants 19 more nuclear reactors | politics news at abelard.org
latest changes & additions at abelard.org link to short briefings documents link to document abstracts link to list of useful data tables quotations at abelard.org, with source document where relevant economics and money zone at abelard.org - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net latest news headlines at abelard's news and comment zone socialism, sociology, supporting documents described France zone at abelard.org - another France Energy - beyond fossil fuels visit abelard's gallery about abelard and abelard.org

back to abelard's front page

site map
'Y

news and comment
politics

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone topic archives: politics

for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)

New translation, the Magna Carta

  claim: iran wants 19 more nuclear reactors

“Iran will soon announce an international tender for building 19 nuclear power plants, an MP was quoted as saying, a week after Russia said it had begun fuel deliveries to the Islamic state's first such facility.

“Kazem Jalali, a spokesman for parliament's national security and foreign policy committee, said each power plant would have a capacity of 1,000 megawatt of electricity, the Iran News daily reported on Monday, without giving further details.” [Quoted from planetark.org]

Marker at abelard.org

“Russia is to supply Iran with a new and lethal anti-aircraft system capable of shooting down American or Israeli fighter jets in the event of any strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

“Iran yesterday confirmed that Russia had agreed to deliver the S-300 air defence system, a move that is likely to irk the Bush administration and gives further proof of Russia and Iran's deepening strategic partnership.

“Iran's defence minister, Mostafa Mohammad Najjar, told Iranian TV that the deal had been agreed under a previous "contract". He did not say when the system would be shipped to Iran.” [Quoted from guardian.co.uk]

Marker at abelard.org

“We believe that Iran has no economic need to proceed with its programme of uranium enrichment," Lavrov told the daily.

“ "We are trying to persuade the Iranians that freezing the programme is to their advantage as it would immediately lead to talks with all countries of the "six", including the United States."

“Such talks, he said, would aim to end any suspicion that Iran had any secret aim to produce nuclear weapons. "Iran's agreement to this proposal is in everyone's interest."

“Iran was aware, he said, that should there be any deviation from agreements to build Bushehr under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, "we will freeze our cooperation". ”[Quoted from uk.reuters.com]

Marker at abelard.org

“If President Bush can't overcome the NIE's intelligence "estimates," his hands will effectively be tied, leaving it solely up to Israel to challenge Iran's nuclear weapons capability. This may now be an impossible task since Israel may have waited too long, hoping the U.S. would do it instead. Thus in coming months we may witness the birth of the new caliphate, headquartered in Tehran.

“When Iran resumes building nuclear weapons (if they haven't already), they will likely widely disperse them so all can't be located and destroyed. Then they can start handing them off with plausible deniability to their terrorist proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas for delivery to any country in the world, including ours, as they have with conventional high explosives many times past. And they don't need ICBMs to do this; small cargo ships can do the job by simply sailing into any port in the world and pushing the button.

“Mr. Bush has the next 11 months to find a way to stop this because it's abundantly clear that opposition presidential candidates, were they to reach office, are unlikely to take effective measures against this kind of risk. For example, Sen. Joe Biden (D., Del.) recently said that he'll immediately file impeachment papers should Mr. Bush take military action against Iran's nuclear program.” [Quoted from wsj.com]