energy tech? | alternative energies news at abelard.org
latest changes & additions at abelard.org link to short briefings documents link to document abstracts link to list of useful data tables quotations at abelard.org, with source document where relevant economics and money zone at abelard.org - government swindles and how to transfer money on the net latest news headlines at abelard's news and comment zone socialism, sociology, supporting documents described France zone at abelard.org - another France Energy - beyond fossil fuels visit abelard's gallery about abelard and abelard.org

back to abelard's front page

site map
'Y

news and comment
alternative energies

article archives at abelard's news and comment zone topic archives: alternative energies

for previously archived news article pages, visit the news archive page (click on the button above)

New translation, the Magna Carta

  energy tech?

“Imagine if you could generate electricity using nuclear power that emitted no radioactivity: it would be the answer to the world's dream of finding a clean, sustainable energy source.” [Quoted from sciencealert.com.au]

Marker at abelard.org

“Sapru estimates that a typical lithium-air battery can offer an output of 1800 watts per kilogram compared to about 120 to 350 watts per kilogram seen in lithium-ion batteries” [Quoted from wired.com]

related material
nuclear power - is nuclear power really really dangerous?
fuel cells and battery-powered vehicles



the web address for the article above is
https://www.abelard.org/news/energy052009.php#energy_tech_230410





advertising
disclaimer


advertising
disclaimer


advertising
disclaimer




radiation fears - visiting capitol building more hazardous than camping outside a nuclear plant

"Using United States Federal Aviation Authority actuarial calculation methods, it is shown that over 1 in 70 Japanese workers will be killed by cancer induced by radiation during their company health checks in a nationwide program which subjects them to the equivalent of over 2000 chest x-rays - more than the average dose received by survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki experiments.

“Recently I was asked to take a barium meal esophagram, also known as a "barium swallow" or gastric fluoroscopy. I refused after I enquired about the intensity and dose. After a long delay, and the worrying statement that the radiologist had to consult a book, I was told it would be 15 millisieverts. I was told that many Japanese companies regard gastric fluoroscopy with this, or even higher doses, as a standard early detection test, which is repeated annually or biannually.

“This means that Japanese workers will be exposed to more radiation than the survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki tests, who received an average dose of 200 millisieverts.

“The single fluoroscopy is equivalent to 150 chest x-rays, and 15 times the yearly maximum exposure allowed in the United States. It greatly exceeds the dose received by workers at high level nuclear plants. It is equal to the exposure received by an astronaut in space for one month (recognized hazard). But the energy is delivered to the most vulnerable organs of the body in just a few minutes.” [Quoted from ratical.org]

Marker at abelard.org

“Sensing the absurdity of the EPA standards, Dr. Michael Gough and I commissioned radiation experts to measure radiation levels in the U.S. Capitol building and compare them with the proposed Yucca Mountain standards. The Capitol contains a great deal of granite and marble building materials that naturally emit the same type of radiation as spent fuel.

“Our experts discovered that radiation dose rates at the Roger Williams statue, located between the Rotunda and Senate Chamber, are up to 65 times greater than what the EPA plans to allow at Yucca Mountain.

“The radiation-dose rate at the Williams statue also is up to 550 percent higher than the dose rate received at the fenceline of a nuke plant, and about 13,000 times higher than the average annual radiation dose from worldwide nuclear-energy production.” [Quoted from foxnews.com]

related material
ionising radiation and health—risk analysis
nuclear power - is nuclear power really really dangerous?