news & archives
I wish to set myself up right from the start as
one of the good guys...
I next wish to lay the groundwork for blaming America and the West.
Here’s some undated ‘news’paper report that will assist that purpose. It doesn’t exactly attribute this view to anyone real, but to ‘Washington’.
I can’t convincingly blame America and the West for the last 10 years as I am not quite as daffy as most left-wing apologists. So let’s concentrate on a decade or more ago.
And it is those times which will allow me to make some sort of plausible case.
In other words, I have to assert that things never change, or my case becomes less convincing.
I have no convincing evidence for this claim, but no-one is likely to notice that, especially mentally-challenged lefties.
Two or three years should be a vague enough claim; if anyone challenges it, I am crafty enough to waffle my way out of it.
Anyways, no-one will ever dare press me on the issue because I can easily make them look picky, or prejudiced. Ho ho ho.
In other words, no-one can ever change their views or behaviour, only I am perfect and morally above suspicion.
Fortunately, none of these people will realise the number of times I have changed my statements on the nature of language and, anyway, in that area I can waffle up such a storm nobody has the foggiest idea what I am on about. (Probably he doesn’t either!)
But who’s gonna question me anyway, after all I am ‘the expert’, and these minnows don’t have the courage to risk appearing too stupid to be able to follow my waffle—sorry, deep academic thought.
Ah, now we shift from the past tense to the present without breaking breath. Bet they won’t notice that!! My, I doubt I’ll even notice it myself!!!
Ah ‘two’ reasons, not quite as daft as the mentally-challenged left who claim only one reason. And let’s forget about all the other reasons discussed. After all the whole left media circus have repeated the lie that it was only one reason so often that hardly anyone remembers anyways.
Of course, we all really know that the two reasons above are genuine, but they are also the most difficult to ‘prove’ in a court room. The evidence is gradually leaking out, and everyone and their dog knows there were terrorist links and that this loon was indeed making a career out of getting hold of any weapons he could.
But, after all, I did start this crap with the comment:
So no-one can claim I don’t care about such things if anyone presses me, and I can always waffle. I’m world-class in that department.
That is, Bush’s speech writers are ignoring the inundation of left-wing crap propaganda, and getting on with freeing up Irak, and that gives me problems.
Of course it isn’t ‘new’, but here is the beauty – I can claim it is ‘new’. After all, I can claim that ‘freeing Irak’ is not the same as ‘democracy’, whatever that is (and I use that word in a most confusing, even egregious, manner as will be seen further on).Of course, as we don’t know what the detailed conditions will be in Irak, we don’t actually know what the people want yet. So promising ‘democracy’ and finding the people have different aspirations is too complex to discuss until we have removed the bastard and discussed with the various factions what they want. After all, these are still somewhat tribal countries.
Then there are other complex considerations for the West and for the planet. Yes, I think I can get away with my habitual empty negativism and sarcasm here as usual.
A sheer bullshit claim, no names again of course. I like that word ‘rapturous’. It sort of suggests democracy is rather over the top emotional, not a reasonable aspiration for free people. Just the sort of word I need to poison the well of rational discourse in order to push my religion.
We have a quote and a name—whoop-de-doo—I wonder who Ignatius is? President of the USA perhaps? Nah, just a reporter getting out a bit of positive copy for the day; but one has to build a house with the straw available.
How remiss of him.
What a silly man wanting to free up those rag-heads.Well, two can play at this game.(I almost said dishonest game—whoops!)
Ah, let’s shift time frame again back to the Cold War, 15 – 23 years ago. None of these daffies will notice. Meanwhile, let’s shift geographically to Indonesia, that’ll add more confusion.
Now let’s confuse things further, the ‘murderous dictators’, that is the equivalent of Madsam. Of course, the numbers are probably rather different, so I wont mention them, or the conditions in these countries at the time.
I wonder why not.
Nothing changes over 15 – 23 years after all. We’ve shifted area and time. Now the quick switch back to the present situation. The more of a switchback ride I give the customers, the better!
Of course, Wolfowitz is not a decent human being like myself, but I can always claim it wasn’t sarcasm if really pressed.
Of course, not the slightest evidence has been presented that anyone wishes to forget anything. But what the hell, they just don’t want you continually changing the subject.
We will discuss one thing or another with you, but not both in the same sentence, or hop all over the shop to serve your silly agenda.
“Fury in Washington”, eh? Who exactly
Do you perhaps mean “criticised”?
As if every politician doesn’t have to allow for the ‘feelings’ of their masses and, of course, Turkish politicians are steadily bringing Turkey, and leading Islam, into the modern world.
Or, as some loon might call it, ‘manufacturing consent’!
In other words, those countries where the controlled media manufactured the opposite consent. Oh dear, no. That was ‘genuine’ public decision!!!
Now would our analyst be becoming a mite tired and emotional? I do hope not.
And now the idiot goes into overdrive, as is ever the case with these leftist propagandists as they near the end of their latest emotional tirade.
Of course, the fool doesn’t understand ‘representational democracy’. Perhaps he is a populist who prefers the emotion of the street to representational democracy and ‘manufacturing consent’.
How did the Solomon Islands get into this, I don’t hear you ask.
Ah, the coalition of the unwilling who want a free ride on the back of those who laid down treasure and blood to free Irakis from—let’s see what the shyster said above:
So glad he is ‘overjoyed’.
And so glad he is happy to back those who manufactured a different consent against the country that pays him and shelters him.
Then go live in one, ducky, and see how you manage.
‘Irakis’, eh? We have a document on reification at abelard.org. How many ‘Irakis’? Better not ask.
Now we shift back 80 years—wow-ee....
Enough already, my yaks call me to other activities. Perhaps you can now finish the job yourselves!
The web address for this item is
email abelard at abelard.org
© abelard, 2003, 27 december
the address for this document is http://www.abelard.org/news/deconstruction.htm